Tenvik vs Make.com for agencies: credits or client docks

Figures checked 30 August 2026 · we build Tenvik, so check them yourself

Make.com meters usage through a credit system — renamed from operations to credits in August 2025, with the same accounting underneath: every module execution consumes credits, and heavier scenarios burn through them faster. Its published tiers are Core, Pro and Teams, priced by credit volume; publicly reported entry prices vary by source (roughly $9-12, $16-21 and $29-38/mo), which itself signals the number moves with your credit plan rather than being fixed.

None of Make's published tiers state a per-client isolation feature or a white-label option — those, if they exist, most plausibly sit inside custom-quoted Enterprise. We mark that as not published rather than guessing. Tenvik takes the opposite approach: one flat price per client-dock count, unlimited executions, isolation and white-label included from the entry tier.

Tenvik

Make.com

Pricing basis

Renamed Aug 2025; same volume-based billing underneath

Flat, per client dock

Metered, per credit (formerly operations)

Entry price

$39/mo (up to 3 docks)

Core tier, ~$9-12/mo (varies by source and credit volume)

Execution limits

Unlimited, every tier

Capped by credit allotment per tier

Per-client isolation

Isolated n8n instance per client

Not published on Core/Pro/Teams

White-label

If it exists, inside custom-quoted Enterprise

Included from $39/mo

Not published on Core/Pro/Teams

Credential vault per client

Included from $39/mo

Connections shared per account

Client billing / rebilling

Planned for the Agency tier

Not a published feature

Push one fix to every client

Template propagation, from $39/mo

Not available — scenarios edited individually

Agency/Enterprise pricing

Published, flat, every tier

Custom quote only — not published

Make's Core/Pro/Teams tiers run roughly $9-38/mo depending on credit volume and billing cadence; reported figures vary by source, so treat any single number as approximate. Enterprise pricing and any agency features there are not published. Checked 2026-08-30.

What Make.com does well

·A visual scenario builder often considered easier to read at a glance than raw node graphs
·A broad, mature app library with many pre-built modules
·Predictable credit-based cost for a single internal team at light-to-moderate volume
·Fully hosted — no infrastructure to provision or manage

When you should pick Make.com

→You're automating for one team or business, not multiple external clients
→Your monthly execution volume is light and predictable enough to fit a fixed credit tier
→You want a hosted visual builder and no interest in touching a server, even a one-click one
→You need enterprise-grade support and will go through a custom sales process for it

When Tenvik is the better fit

·You serve 3+ external clients and need each billed, isolated and rebrandable
·You want a flat monthly price that doesn't move with execution volume
·You want to fix a workflow once and propagate it to every client instance
·You want the engine to be open and portable, on infrastructure you control

Questions people ask

Is Make's pricing operations-based or credits-based?

Both, at different times. Make billed on operations until renaming the unit to credits in August 2025 — you pay for volume of module executions, not for a fixed set of clients.

Does Make have an agency or reseller tier?

Not published. Core, Pro and Teams are general-purpose tiers with no stated per-client isolation or white-label. Enterprise is where those would most plausibly live, but its detail is not disclosed publicly.

Can I run Make scenarios through Tenvik?

No — Tenvik runs n8n, not Make. You'd rebuild scenario logic as n8n workflows. The tradeoff is a flat per-dock price and unlimited executions instead of a credit meter.

Other comparisons

Software that works for you. Not the other way around.

One dock per client, on your own infrastructure. Founding slots lock the founding price for life.

Join the founding list